photo credit: http://www.usappleblog.org/
In my last blog post, I wrote about the preliminary experiences of administering the AAPPL exam in my classes. Several people asked what the AAPPL measure was–in short, it’s an online, computer-based proficiency exam produced by ACTFL and tied to ACTFL proficiency levels. You can find more about the exam here; you can even try a sample exam in many languages here.
It is recommended that you allot 2 hours for the exam. I found that we needed more time, say in the range of 3 hours. I had scheduled us for the computer lab for 2-90 minute periods, and most students used most of that time. The test has sections for listening, reading, presentational writing, and interpersonal listening/speaking. As the teacher, you can decide which sections you want to have tested, and you do not have to do them all at once. My students seemed to really like the idea of working at their own pace and being able to rewind/edit their work as needed. The whole test is $20/student, but it’s priced per section, so you pay less per student if you do less than the entire assessment.
Results from the interpretive portions of the exam are graded immediately, so students were able to see their scores as soon as they finished. The interpersonal and presentational sections took a couple of weeks to be scored, and I just got those reports back this week.
In an effort to give a little more encouragement to students who were “stick a fork in me” done with school mentally, I allowed students to bank their interpretive scores and use them for the corresponding sections of our final exam if they were satisfied with their performance. Our state-determined exit targets for level 2 are novice high, so if they scored N4 or above on the interpretive segments, I felt there was no reason to repeat them on the final 4 days later.
After scores have been calculated, the system prepares a score report for each student. I found this to be very helpful and interesting, especially for students who are continuing their language study. If we were doing this mid-year I could see how it would be an amazing tool for working with students to personalize their learning and set goals for the future. You can see samples of a score report with the corresponding explanation sheet from one of my students here:
Overall, I was very pleased with the exam. Here are some takeaway thoughts:
- I was very surprised at the outcomes: my students did much better on the interpretive sections than I would have predicted, and slightly worse on the presentational writing.
- We had tech struggles on the interpersonal sections of many students’ exams, but I think that had to do with strict firewalls in our district.
- Having just returned from AP training, I am even more interested in continuing to use AAPPL in the lower levels as part of the vertical alignment leading up to the AP course. The sections of AAPPL are similar to those of the AP exam, but at a novice level. I can see it being a stress reducer for students to have already taken a test like this before taking the AP test.
- I love that it emphasizes real-life tasks.
- I love the feedback that it offers students.
- The cost, while small per student, will continue to be an impediment to widespread adoption in many schools. We are talking about administering it at the end of levels 2 and 4 in the future.
- The technology component can be challenging. This is something I would need to work on at my school before giving it again. Several scores came back as below novice levels, but I know that they were better than that because I heard them recording. I don’t fault AAPPL or the testing company, just the tech struggles that befell us.
- Strong–but attainable– performance on the assessment can qualify students in NC (and maybe your state too) for the global language endorsement on their transcripts.
What questions do you have about AAPPL? What have your experiences been with the assessment?